These experimental results are not yet explained using the known models of classical
physics. One has to consider extending the quantum mechanics paradigms in order
to account for these experimental results. In fact there is a need to go beyond some
prejudices derived from the only known mean of communications available in the XXth
century: electromagnetic transmissions which require an electromagnetic wave carrying
energy, thus leading to possibly erroneous theorems by mixing information transfer
and energy.
In the presently executed experimental protocols, during the stimulation applied
to the master sample (here by approaching a Fe-55 source of X-ray), some of the entangled
excited nuclei go back to their ground state (e.g. the stable state of Indium), thus
collapsing their quantum couplings; as a result, the corresponding entangled metastable
excited nuclei in the slave sample (i.e. those which were having a quantum coupling
to a formerly excited nucleus in the master sample) becomes non-entangled. The half-life
of such excited nuclei in the slave may differ from the half-life of entangled nuclei:
hence the variation of gamma count measured on the slave sample (here the un-stimulated
Indium foil). One may suspect that entangled nuclei have a half-life dependant upon
all entangled nuclei of the group thus explaining a difference of gamma counts within
the slave sample.
Hence, it may be that by approaching the Fe-55 X-ray source to the master sample,
a nucleus de-excited in the master sample, certainly causes an instantaneous collapse
of the entanglement, but does not cause an instantaneous de-excitation of the corresponding
formerly entangled nuclei in the slave sample: the variation in the gamma counts
(of the slave) may be differed according to the randomness of the half-life de-excitation
of un-entangled metastable nuclei.
